000			03201cam a2200481 a 4500
001			ocn313654288
003			OCoLC
005			20230829030706.0
008			090319s2009 ilu b 001 0 eng
010			_a 2009011678
020			_a9780830837045 _q(pbk. ; _qalk. paper)
020			_a0830837043
029	1		_aAU@ _b000043985065
029	1		_aNZ1 _b13317375
035			_a(OCoLC)313654288 _z(OCoLC)935534858
040			_aDLC _beng _cDLC _dBTCTA _dYDXCP _dC#P _dBWX _dCDX _dSGB _dBDX _dLMR _dOCLCA _dOCLCF _dOCLCQ _dNZABT _dMNLUT _dOCLCQ _dOCLCO _dJDP _dH4N _dOCLCQ _dNYP
049			_aMAIN
050	0	0	_aBS651 _b.W275 2009
082	0	0	_a231.7/65 _222
100	1		_aWalton, John H., _d1952- _939581
245	1	4	_aThe lost world of Genesis One : _bancient cosmology and the origins debate / _cJohn H. Walton.
264		1	_aDowners Grove, Ill. : _bIVP Academic, _c[2009]
264		4	_c©2009
300			_a191 pages ; _c21 cm
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_aunmediated _bn _2rdamedia
338			_avolume _bnc _2rdacarrier
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505	0		_aGenesis 1 is ancient cosmology -- Ancient cosmology is function oriented -- "Create" (Hebrew baraʼ) concerns and functions -- The beginning state in Genesis 1 is nonfunctional -- Days one to three in Genesis 1 establish functions -- Days four to six in Genesis 1 install functionaries -- Divine rest is in a temple -- The cosmos is a temple -- The seven days of Genesis 1 relate to the cosmic temple inauguration -- The seven days of Genesis 1 do not concern material origins -- "Functional cosmic temple" offers face-value exegesis -- Other theories of Genesis 1 either go too far or not far enough -- The difference between origin accounts in science and scripture is metaphysical in nature -- God's roles as creator and sustainer are less different than we have thought -- Current debate about intelligent design ultimately concerns purpose -- Scientific explanations of origins can be viewed in light of purpose, and if so, are unobjectionable -- Resulting theology in this view of Genesis 1 is stronger, not weaker -- Public science education should be neutral regarding purpose.
520			_aJohn H. Walton presents and defends twenty propositions supporting a literary and theological understanding of Genesis 1 within the context of the ancient Near Eastern world and unpacks its implications for our modern scientific understanding of origins. --from publisher description.
630	0	0	_aBible. _pGenesis, I. _xCriticism, interpretation, etc. _917226
630	0	7	_aBible. _pGenesis, I. _2fast _0(OCoLC)fst01808047 _917227
650		0	_aBiblical cosmology. _928964
650		0	_aCreationism. _922759
650		0	_aCosmogony. _94410
650		7	_aBiblical cosmology. _2fast _0(OCoLC)fst00831325 _928964
650		7	_aCosmogony. _2fast _0(OCoLC)fst00880584 _94410
650		7	_aCreationism. _2fast _0(OCoLC)fst00882407 _922759
655		4	_aCriticism, interpretation, etc.
655		7	_aCriticism, interpretation, etc. _2fast _0(OCoLC)fst01411635 _968349
655		7	_aCriticism, interpretation, etc. _2lcgft _968349
942			_cBK _hBS 651 .W275 2009 _iBK _01 _2lcc
999			_c14867 _d14867